Search results for "Lex XII Tabularum"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

Riflessioni su D. 50.16.130 (Ulp. 2 ad leg. Iul. et Pap.)

2013

The research focuses on analysis of a well-known fragment of Justinian’s Digesta: 50.16.130 (Ulp. 2 ad leg. Iul. et Pap.). Formerly, several scholars have raised many doubts regard to its authenticity. The author’s basic idea is that there are not solid issues in favor of the hypothesis that the fragment is not genuine. On the contrary, both the examination of the terminology, used in the fragment, and the comparison between D. 50.16.130 and other sources (in particular: D. 38.16.1 pr.; 5.3.1 e 3; Tit. Ulp. 11.2-3; 11.14) might provide interesting evidences in support of its classical content.

Lex XII Tabularumsuccessione ab intestato (o ex lege)successione ex testamentoSettore IUS/18 - Diritto Romano E Diritti Dell'Antichita'‘nemo pro parte testatus pro parte intestatus decedere potest ’
researchProduct

XII Tab. 6.3 nelle testimonianze di Cicerone

2011

The investigation consists largely in a renewed analysis of some well-known Cicero's passages (top. 4.23; pro Caec. 19.54; de har. resp. 7.14; pro Caec. 26.74) in order to reconstruct the text of XII Tab. 6.3 and to ascertain his substantial meaning. The basic idea of the author is that the ancient wording of this provision ( usus auctoritas fundi biennium esto; ceterarum rerum annus) refers to an institution (usus auctoritas) which performed in the law of evidence, apart from special exceptions, the function of the later usucapio.

UsucapioLex AtiniaLex XII TabularumSettore IUS/18 - Diritto Romano E Diritti Dell'Antichita'UsuAuctorita
researchProduct